DOUBLE SPEAK Essay -- essays research papers

DoublespeakDoublespeak, whether intentional or unintentional is communication that is obscure, pompous, vague, evasive and confusing.() In most instances, doublespeak tries to achieve a particular objective as is the berth in President Bushs address to the nation on September 11, after the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington. The objective of this lecturing is clearly to mollify the emotions of a frightened nation and at the same conviction set the t cardinal for what is to come as a result of the attacks. In this speech one rump find m each workouts of doublespeak. These examples seem to be intentional although they defy typical doublespeak in that the doublespeak is not intended for any personal gains and is not concealed with a lot of convoluted language. If one can understand some of the basic principles about making comprehend of media-speak then the domino effect of this type of speech can be reduced.One of the first statements President Bush makes in his speech can be classified as doublespeak. When he says Our carriage of life, our very freedom came under attack, he is indirectly saying that everything Americans argon accustomed to and enjoy is at stake. With these simple news shows and the pace elect to deliver them President Bush is strategically taking the emotions of the American citizenry for a ride while making it clear that the American mass are his target audience. An important principle for properly deciphering this instance of doublespeak is to leave out first responses and get them out in the open so the simpleness of the message can be received clearly and unobstructed by inner thoughts. Other examples of doublespeak that fit into the same category as the introductory one are when President Bush uses the phrases, Foundation of America and make of American Resolve. Both of these examples attempt to evoke an emotional response although, the emotions attempting to be extracted are different from those in the beginning o f the speech. They differ because they set the tone for new offensive and secure feelings opposed to the original feelings of defense and endangerment. This example also illustrates how obscure doublespeak can be.President Bush regards the attacks as horrifying and evil acts. The word evil is the doublespeak in this example. The way he uses this word automati... ...nbspG-d is stronger than any human on earth.Walk with the valley of the behind of death, I fear no evilNot fearing the terrorists because of such a tragedy in close proximity.Every walk of life any races, genders, and cultures.Resolve for justice and peaceWe are going to war.Eliminating Mediaspeak Is it Clear instantly?Doublespeak is deceptive as are most of the examples mentioned from this speech. On the contrary, doublespeak as explored through this example is sometimes a necessary tool to address an counter in a manner that is politically correct. When the doublespeak present in this speech is eliminated the car dinal themes are not entirely lost and the speech is mum effective. I think given the circumstances the audience was pleased with the underlying messages delivered and probably expected them making it easier to decipher President Bushs jargon. The speech could have been delivered without doublespeak and more directly, but the perception of the audience would in all probability remain the same.