Militarism: Iran & Nigeria Essay

Every state dreams of having stability and structure to properly command and control its citizens. All states wish that they possessed such great structure, that each citizen of their country would be fully protected and looked after. However, there are nearly states that lack resources and are not capable to ensure the safety and fountainhead being of their citizens. Most states that offer solidity and organization more than apt(predicate) arrest a severe armed forces that have power in spite of appearance the g everywherenment, referring to militarism.The concept of militarism states that it is a vigorous soldiers spirit or policy. A principle or policy of maintaining a large armed services establishment1. Militarism goes beyond the thought of defense and battleship, it refers to the amount of power a array has over or with a government. With militarism comes the excessive spending on military and the militarys ability to have total control. Though is it important to ha ve a strong relationship between military and the government, Nigeria and Iran have cardinal separate ways of intertwining the two in their states.Nigeria is known for its strong military presence within the government. The degree of militarism in Nigeria is high because of their past memoir being under civil rule. During the first forty years of Nigerias independence, this state only lasted ten years under a civilian government. A few years after the down glow of their civilian government, they short fell under military rule. Nigeria has always been considered stronger and more power when they were controlled by their government, rather than following a democracy2 this exemplifies militarism.Although in Nigeria they tend to use their military to create a corruption within politics, other countries use their militaries for deviance purposes. Iran has always had a mediocre military. Iran does not have a strong military, so their influence is of low impact on politics. The degre e of militarism in Iran is subtle because they mostly focus on working with the citizens directly, rather than attempt to govern them.With a broken military, all they have to offer is a societal impact. With the citizens of Iran, their military helps keep them in order while under governmental oversight. In Comparative Politics, it was stated, since the Islamic Revolution in 1979, the Iranian government has worked hard to maintain control of the military. Rather than a strong military and a weak civilian government, Iran had a weak and fractured military alongside a strong civilian political institutions3.Iran has always worked to occur under autonomy and flourish into a well developed autarkical state. There becomes a time where the military begins to overrule their government and encounter matters into their own hands. Currently, a lot of Nigerian citizens are realizing what has been going on for the past forty years and are starting to take action. In Iran, they continue to be content with civilians to governing their state, while the military catch ones breath under governmental watch to ensure that they do not do anything crazy.Both countries are lesser-developed countries, but when it comes to militarism, it all depends on what they citizens wish to fall under. Having a high degree of militarism is not always a impregnable thing to have because the military having a heavy involvement in politics and governance will not end well due(p) to budgeting, defense, and a positive societal impact. When citizens live under the governance of people, wise decisions are made. When citizens live under the governance of the military, more than likely upkeep amongst each other arises.